Justify public administrators' Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Justify public administrators - Research physical composition ExampleThe personal points of view are necessary when formulating, assessing and looking for concrete plans of action for an administrative situation. However, it is collapse to question how an individual relays solutions through public service given bureaucracy follows certain levels of hierarchy. Weber assert that there is a logically consistent function in his rarefied typewrite (Kim, 2007) In footing of public regime, how can this be achieved? This consistency, ultimately, faces difficulties before it can be achieved. Now, before fully deliberating the high-minded type of Max Weber, there should be a thorough knowledge of what public administration is. Public administration is a field of study that deals with the function of government as an institution and the general public it serves and how it handles the matters that involves monastic order through centralized governance (Raadschelders, 2008). At the same time, public administration involves organizational theory, management information and concept of public relate (Henry, 1975). ... Paradoxically, the ideal type, no matter how good it is can have its flaws non just on the manner of administration but also on the level of organization. According to Weber, the worry that rises with the ideal type is oligarchy, dehumanization, and irrationality (Kim, 2007). How do these factors really affect the manner of how public administration is implement within the organized structure of a system and the ideal type? The government really has a role as to how they will exercise governance effectively. Most of the time, the elite of a society pick out part on the administration government and has the capacity to determine the manner of governance they want to touch on (Raadschelders, 2008). Now here lies the problem. How are people really guaranteed that efficient governance is achieved since the elite has a precise strong capacity to maint ain their hold on to power to further their personal interests rather than the interest of the general public. Corruption, abuse and exploitation together with irrational thinking distort the logical consistency that the ideal type imposes. Democracy, in its context, is good yet the manner of administration becomes undemocratic especially if the consistency of tire is not administered properly. Public administration also calls for objective criticism (Henry, 1975). As seen in the local and planetary contemporary politics, criticisms have been rampant to fully expose the flaws of the bureaucratic status quo. In its greatest sense, bureaucracy is good yet the manner of addressing criticisms, especially in the case of the leader, is not really adequate. They may certify their flaws in terms of leadership that destroys the logical consistency asserted by Webers ideal type yet concrete plans of