The First Millenium Essay Example for Free

The First Millenium EssayThe Year 1000 was once considered a year of apocalyptic proportions as biblical beliefs associated it with 1000 years after the Christs death. Historians in the 19th century had once imagined the terror during the exterminate of 1000 years. Without any serious argument, the notion was introduced despite many who chose to ignore the issue. Current views have however delineated eschatological sen agents of terror that once wound up religious transformations in the 11th century.Many historians have now effectively banished the thought which referenced a wrongful data without providing the solidified basis for such(prenominal) documentation. Lacey and Danzinger has however retrieved from Englands possession visible foundations of history through an old book written in black oak ink sometime approximately the year 1020 probably by a cleric working in the manuscript studio of the Canterbury Cathedral (p. 5). This book was later regarded as the Julius Work schedule which provided basis for both authors of the discovery on what life was like a millennium after Christs death.The book actually focuses on the insouciant lives of the Anglo-Saxons timed at the end of the first millennium. It strived to reconstruct the realities in a monthly tour throughout the period. The ordinary appearance of an English individual was hence portrayed as tall and plurality In Victorian England could not match our health or physique (p.9). Yet life was unsophisticated- as flock wore sack-like tunics in colors that were less muddy (p.10).No fashionable clothes were worn as people looked extremely uniform as a centering of ease for the daily toils. In effect, life expectancy was as well short where a boy of 12 was old enough to swear an oath of loyalty to the king while girls married easily in their teens (p.10). When most adults die at an early age, people who lived well into midlife are considered respectable. At that time, England was able to par ent a population of at least a million souls where people were often grouped together as hunter-gatherers who lived in small groups and villages (p. 11). The simplicity was so pivotal in such that cow dung, horse manure, sheep droppings and chicken shit perforated the air (p.119).Men were also goodly driven to theology as excitement is drawn upon a discussion and general arguments over the observance of the Christian year (p.12), the lives of spirits and saints who lived their lives for the sake of Jesus teachings (p. 17). England was in item a network of magical sites containing physical relics of at least 1 saint (p. 19). Faith was in the main core of the simple society as peoples lives were entwined in the lives of saints. The believer could even point to the bible which contained no less than 35 miracles in which Jesus defeated illness through the power of creed (p. 122). Faith was therefore considered of highest consequence as people of the midriff ages placed higher degre es of trust and faith. Every believer was highly aware that sins were keeping the superhuman tradition alive (p.122) and reliance to faith is highly a virtue.Faith in medicine was akin to belief in God. Persons during the period have an gleam of disease and illness. Folk remedy might have been applied with a hefty amount of religious conviction and care. Cures for maladies also involved binding the angry walk of herb crossword to the head with a red bandana while chilblains were to be treated with a mixture of ems, wine and fennel alkali (126). Virility was also considered an important health matter that required ministrations in the groin area with yellow lowered herb agrimony (p. 126). Cleanliness was unheard of and people do not bathe as often as we do now. Nudity was even accepted in exchange for food and grain.During the time of the middle ages, the government existed under the rules of the king and his minions. Many may have not seen the king as personal portraits did not exist (p.17) and people were more familiar with the representatives of the church than with political persons. The lord of the land as the kings minion was also considered the loaf giver (p.46-47) who would pay the Viking invaders at least 2000 pounds in deluxe and silver upon which payment invaders departed (p. 14). In effect, people were highly dependent upon the immediate rulers of lands or village leaders for their safety. Slavery was consistent with the feudal placement introduced by Viking invaders with Dublin operating the largest market. Typically everyone was in bondage where men expressed a token of their fresh start or servitude as irrelevant to prison or difficult times during famine (p. 45).Book ReviewLacey, Robert and Danny Danzinger. The Year 1000 What Life Was Like at the Turn of the First Millenium An Englishmans World, 1st ed. Boston Little Brown, 1999.The book Lacey and Danzinger wrote is considered a refreshing answer to the present day worries on the changes which a new millennium can bring. The simple fact that even social scientist were led to believe on the apocalyptic interpretations proved how social changed brought out the emergence of this belief based on the heathenish perceptions of the Middles Ages. The daily dangers of life during the period were centered on possible famines which dont actually happen very oftenand if it did, for shorter periods.While the book provides a realistic knowledge of the middle ages negating a continued myth on eschatological findings, it still attempts to reap benefits for the common millennium beliefs. However historians alike impart welcome the accomplishments that strive to understand medieval lives into a larger global context. While we get insights on the activities of a calendar year, the daily lives of peasants and aristocracies are also exposed. Practicality was the usual behavior of people in an agricultural society.After defining the social dynamics of the period based on the Jules Cale ndar, I can by all odds support that any romantic visions of the Middle Ages should be discounted in favor of the truth based on research and finding both authors made back up by ample evidence of truth. Religion has overemphasized wrong notions that are inherited into our modern era in an unbalanced mysticism. Through Lacey and Danzinger, the powerful heresies of the first decades which looked into the physique of the monks provided basis for a historical research to ensue with proper documentation of facts. Hope being the key for existence that promised to inspire even the practical practical individuals was definitely believed in.The only points which the authors failed to consider are the discussion on the recorded events of the period as written by other authors based on the chronological record of Saint Armand, discussing a power shattering quake that anticipated a catastrophic event for the next millennium. While Lacey and Danzinger provided views disuniting the eschatolo gical findings, they were not able to flood out any countermeasure against the popular voices of the apocalyptic myth or doomsday beliefs. They have the ample chance to disregard the works of the destructive prodigies whose perspectives dwelled on creating a defeatist confirmation of religious chaos.Lacey and Danzinger can therefore do well to disorganize this idea in full and weaken any widespread beliefs on the end of days. While having the capacity to exorcised doomsday believers, Lacey and Danzinger left this out for readers to discover in a pragmatic way. Altogether however, I sing praises for this book that proclaim human life in the Middle Ages. Both authors have gone a long way in explaining what life was about under moral religious theologies with their documentary evidence as proof. Through their conjectural terrain, I have accepted the confidence of history in a linear time of peasant and aristocratic existence in the middle Ages.